June 17th 2024.
In a thrilling Group E clash at Euro 2024, Slovakia pulled off a stunning upset over Belgium, securing a 1-0 victory. The game was full of excitement and tension, with both teams fighting for the win. However, one player in particular, Romelu Lukaku, had a rollercoaster of a match, with two of his goals being disallowed for offside.
The first goal was scored by Ivan Schranz in the 7th minute, taking advantage of a mistake from Manchester City's Jeremy Doku. Despite multiple opportunities to equalize, Belgium was unable to find the back of the net. Lukaku, who had been a key player for his team, thought he had finally scored the equalizer when he tapped in a knock down from Amadou Onana. However, upon review, it was determined that Lukaku was in an offside position when he received the ball and the goal was disallowed.
As the game neared its end, Lukaku had another chance to redeem himself. Lois Openda made a great run down the left and found Lukaku, who blasted the ball into the back of the net. But once again, VAR intervened and the goal was disallowed. This time, it was determined that Openda had handled the ball in the build-up to the goal. Many were left frustrated and confused by this decision, with some even calling it scandalous.
Former Premier League star Chris Sutton was among those who felt that the decision was harsh. He expressed his disbelief at the ruling, stating that in the Premier League, the goal would have stood. However, former referee Christina Unkel, who was providing analysis for ITV during the competition, defended the VAR decision. According to her, the correct interpretation of the law had been applied, as Openda's arm was extended near or above his shoulder, making it a deliberate handling offense.
Unkel went on to explain that although the interpretation of what constitutes a deliberate handball has changed recently, Openda's arm position in this instance still falls under that category, as it helped him control the ball. She acknowledged that it was a debatable decision, but ultimately, it was in line with the recommended decision from both UEFA and IFAB.
In the end, the decision to disallow Lukaku's goal was a controversial one, with many feeling that it was too harsh. But as Unkel pointed out, the rules and guidelines regarding handball are constantly evolving, and in this situation, the referee made the call based on the current interpretation. It may have been a tough break for Lukaku and Belgium, but it ultimately came down to the referee's interpretation of the law.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
