Lauryn Goodman, Kyle Walker's ex-girlfriend, lost a court battle revealing her lengthy list of demands.

The judge was extremely critical.

July 30th 2024.

Lauryn Goodman, Kyle Walker's ex-girlfriend, lost a court battle revealing her lengthy list of demands.
The court battle between Kyle Walker and Lauryn Goodman has been making headlines, and now the full details of their heated legal dispute have been revealed to the public. It all began when influencer Goodman demanded child maintenance from Walker, a footballer who is married to his teenage sweetheart and shares four children with her.

Goodman's list of demands was quite extensive, including a luxurious £2.4 million mansion in Sussex and a £33,000 air conditioning unit to cope with the unbearable summer heat. She even requested smaller items, such as an iron, with specific stipulations. This all came to light after Walker fathered a child with Goodman during a break in his relationship with his wife, and then again in 2022 while still with his wife. This led to a media frenzy and Walker being kicked out of his family's mansion in Cheshire.

During the court proceedings, it was revealed that Walker was ordered to purchase Goodman a £1.85 million home within a 60-mile radius of a Sussex town, to keep her away from his other children and his wife. He was also mandated to pay £8,000 per month in child support. However, Goodman's demands didn't stop there. She also requested a £33,000 air conditioning system and a £31,000 astro turf for her one-year-old daughter, who she believes may become a professional footballer one day.

The court also heard about additional demands, such as £500 per month for a hot tub exclusively for the children's use, a gardener at £28 per hour, and £171.81 per month for two mobile phones. Goodman also requested items such as an iron, water filters, garden furniture, wardrobes, and outdoor lighting, totaling over £10,000. In response, Walker agreed to purchase a £2.4 million property in Sussex and spend over £120,000 on interior furnishings.

The judge described Walker as "sensible, honest, and reliable" and lifted the reporting restrictions on the case, which is rare for family court proceedings. He also stated that Goodman used Walker as an "open-ended checkbook" and orchestrated a media campaign to intrude on their private lives. Walker's team released a statement saying that the judge's decision exposed Goodman's "insatiable greed and relentless pursuit of money."

In response, Goodman said that the proceedings were "difficult and stressful" and that she had only ever wanted to provide for her children's futures. She also mentioned that she is a dedicated single mother and will continue to do her best for her children. Both parties have until August 13 to appeal the court's decisions.

[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]

 0
 0