Lot’s of discussion in the blog world emanating from Bob Metcalfe’s response to the IEEE Spectrum piece suggesting that Metcalfe’s law overstates the value that an additional node creates on a network.
I think its great that Bob defended the law named after him and went on to discuss its role in social networks. But I was hoping he’d discuss Reed’s Law which states that the value growth of a social network is much greater, instead of n^2 its c2^n. Anything that grows at the power of ^n is a big deal.
To date, the best thinking/writing I’ve seen on this subject was a post Tom Evslin did last fall.
Given the value creation we’ve witnessed in the past year with
juggernauts like MySpace and YouTube, I wonder of Reed may be right. I
am not enough of a math wiz to figure that out. So I’d love to hear
what Bob Metcalfe thinks.