June 17th 2023.
It's no surprise to see Bethesda fans getting excited about the upcoming Starfield game. After all, it's been a long time since Skyrim and they want to believe that this time Bethesda will deliver. But is this really likely?
History suggests otherwise; Fallout 3 was promised to have 200 endings, yet it only had two. As for Skyrim, the revolutionary AI they promised ended up being little more than the same repetitive side quests featuring NPCs that acted like something from 1998.
The pattern continues with Bethesda's recent titles. Players admit that the gameplay is average at best, the writing and story is bad, and the assets are copy-pasted, making exploration repetitive and dull. What's more, the modding community often steps in to try and make the game enjoyable - but why waste time modding a bad game when you can just play a good one?
The reader suggests that Starfield won't be able to compete with the likes of Tears of the Kingdom which is already being called game of the generation. We can already do mechas in Tears of the Kingdom and it actually works - why should we expect Starfield to be any different?
It's clear that Bethesda has a poor track record when it comes to delivering on their promises. If we've learned anything from their games, it's that we should be cautious when it comes to the hype. While fans may be excited to see what Starfield has to offer, it's unlikely to be the game of the year.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
