Google has changed its mind about removing third-party cookies from its Chrome browser, following backlash from advertisers. Google has reversed its decision to get rid of third-party cookies in Chrome, after facing criticism from advertisers.

In 2020, Google made a big announcement about its plans to address privacy concerns by eliminating third-party cookies and introducing a new system called Privacy Sandbox. This new feature promised to give users more control over their data while still allowing advertisers and publishers to target consumers and measure their ad performance in the background. However, in a recent blog post on July 22, Google acknowledged that their solution was not ready for release yet and would continue to support third-party cookies in the meantime.

According to Google, their early testing of the Privacy Sandbox APIs showed potential for achieving the desired privacy outcomes. They also recognized that this transition would require a lot of work and would impact all parties involved in online advertising. In light of this, Google proposed an updated approach that would prioritize user choice. Instead of getting rid of third-party cookies altogether, they would introduce a new feature in Chrome that would allow people to make informed decisions about their data and adjust their choices at any time. Google is currently discussing this new path with regulators and plans to engage with the industry as they roll it out.

However, Google's plans have faced some pushback from partners and industry players. In a blog post, Anthony Chavez, the VP of Privacy Sandbox, expressed concerns about the readiness of Google's feature. Another participant in Google's grant program, Index Exchange, also released a blog post detailing the issues they saw with the Privacy Sandbox. They pointed out that the current limitations of the feature made it too costly and inefficient for general use, and there were also risks for publishers and the programmatic ecosystem as a whole.

As reported by Business Insider, Google's plans were also met with opposition from a complaint filed by The Movement for an Open Web, an advertising industry group, to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). According to the group's co-founder, James Rosewell, they have always advocated for a fair competition among solutions, and forcing Google's solution on the market without any alternatives was not acceptable.

In 2021, Wired published an article criticizing Google's approach to privacy as mere "privacy theater." The tech giant's Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC) project aims to group users based on similar interests to protect their identities, but privacy researcher and former FTC chief technologist Ashkan Soltani argued that it does not address the root problem of surveillance capitalism. He also pointed out that Google's system does not discourage the collection or exchange of personal information, nor does it address issues like clickbait and misinformation. Therefore, many critics believe that Google's solution is not a comprehensive solution for privacy concerns.

[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]