"Checking if Trump and Harris' debate claims about people eating cats and dogs are true."

People are consuming the pets of those who live there.

September 11th 2024.

In his latest speech, former US President Donald Trump made some shocking claims about immigrants and their supposed actions in the town of Springfield. During a televised debate with his opponent Kamala Harris, he alleged that immigrants were not only coming into the country, but also eating family pets. This bizarre rant stemmed from his running mate JD Vance spreading false claims that Haitians were snatching cats and dogs in Springfield.

As Harris listened, she couldn't help but laugh and shake her head at the outlandish statements. And she wasn't the only one - many Americans watching the debate were probably left bewildered and holding their breath in disbelief. As the moderator pointed out, there is no evidence or credible reports to support these claims. In fact, the city manager of Springfield even confirmed that there have been no reports of pets being harmed by immigrants in the community.

Despite this, Trump continued to insist that he had seen TV interviews of people whose pets had been taken and eaten by immigrants. He even used these baseless claims to push his agenda that immigrants are committing crimes at a higher rate than others. These claims, which were originally fabricated by far-right activists, were then spread by Vance as part of a political attack on Harris.

Springfield, a city with a population of around 60,000, has taken in a significant number of migrants in recent years, primarily from Haiti. However, this influx of immigrants has not led to any reports of pets being harmed or any violent takeovers of the town, as Trump has claimed.

During the debate, Trump also repeated his false statement that millions of migrants are pouring into the country from foreign prisons and mental institutions. He even went as far as to say that they are taking over towns and buildings. However, there is no evidence to support these claims. In fact, a Reuters Fact Check found that some of Harris' claims were exaggerated or disputed, but there were no major falsehoods on her end.

In another instance, Trump falsely claimed that Democrats support killing newborn babies, a statement that he often shares at his rallies. However, this has been proven to be untrue. Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, do not support executing babies.

Later in the debate, when the topic shifted to the Middle East, Trump accused Harris of hating Israel and claimed that the country would not exist if she became president. Harris refuted these claims and stated that she has always supported Israel throughout her career.

Trump also made the bold statement that crime rates are down globally, except in the United States, where he said they were "through the roof." However, FBI data released in March showed a decrease in homicides across the country, contradicting the public perception that crime is on the rise.

In conclusion, Trump's claims during the debate were largely unfounded and have been proven to be false. Despite this, he continues to spread misinformation and use it to further his own political agenda. It is important to fact-check and question these statements to ensure that the public is not misled by false information.

[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]

 0
 0