Slavery still exists.

A Swiss court has sentenced four members of the UK's wealthiest Hinduja family to up to four and a half years in prison for exploiting their domestic workers at their Geneva mansion.

June 24th 2024.

Slavery still exists.
A recent court ruling in Switzerland has caused quite a stir in the justice system. Four members of the affluent Hinduja family, considered the richest in the UK, were found guilty of mistreating their domestic workers and were sentenced to up to four and a half years in prison. The family, consisting of India-born mogul Prakash Hinduja, his wife Kamal, their son Ajay, and daughter-in-law Namrata, were also charged with human trafficking, although they were ultimately acquitted of those charges. In response to the judgement, the Hindujas expressed shock and disbelief and have filed an appeal in a higher court.

The case revolved around three Indian workers who were brought to Switzerland by the family. These workers claimed to have been paid very low wages, ranging from 200 to 400 Swiss francs per month, and were forced to work excessively long hours, up to 18 hours a day. This was significantly lower than the minimum wage in Geneva, which is 4,426 Swiss francs. The workers also alleged that their passports were taken away and that they were rarely allowed to leave the family's mansion in the posh Cologny neighborhood of Geneva. Shockingly, the prosecuting attorney Yves Bertossa revealed that the family spent more money on their pet dog than on their servants. In a scathing statement, Bertossa condemned the family for taking advantage of vulnerable workers and said, "They're profiting from the misery of the world." Despite reaching a settlement with the workers, the Hindujas are still facing legal action due to the serious nature of the charges against them.

It is worth noting that this is not the first time the Hinduja family has faced controversy. Years ago, three brothers from the family, Srichand, Gopichand, and Prakash, were implicated in the infamous Bofors scandal, where a Swedish firm allegedly bribed Indian officials and politicians in a defense deal. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) charged the brothers with accepting kickbacks, but the case was eventually dismissed by the Delhi High Court in 2005 due to lack of evidence. With an estimated net worth of $20 billion, the Hinduja family has business interests in various sectors, including oil and gas, heavy vehicles, healthcare, banking, and financial services, and has a global presence in 38 countries, employing over 200,000 people.

This case has brought attention to the fact that the ultra-rich can be held accountable for their actions, something that is almost unheard of in a country like India, where the system is often biased in favor of the wealthy and powerful. If these workers had been mistreated in India, it is unlikely that they would have received any justice. This highlights the stark contrast between the justice system in advanced Western democracies, where even the rich and powerful are not above the law, and developing countries like India.

Moreover, this incident raises another concerning issue - the disregard for the law among Indians, regardless of their status. It seems to be a common practice for Indians, whether rich or poor, to bring their servants with them wherever they go. This is not limited to just the Hinduja family or the wealthy elite, even India's diplomats do the same when they are posted in foreign countries. A well-known example is that of Devyani Khobragade, an Indian Foreign Service officer who was accused by her domestic worker of ill-treatment and non-payment of salary while she was posted in New York. This attitude of treating domestic workers as slaves is still prevalent in India and is a cause for shame.

In conclusion, this case not only exposes the exploitation of workers by the rich and powerful but also sheds light on the deep-rooted issue of disregard for the law in India. It is high time for a change in mindset and for the government to take necessary steps to ensure that the rights of all individuals, regardless of their social status, are protected and respected.

[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]

 0
 0