September 24th 2024.
The rise of illegally modified e-bikes has become a major concern in the past year, as they pose a threat to other cyclists and pedestrians. MetroTalk is inviting readers to share their opinions on this topic and others in the comments section.
Some readers are applauding the efforts of the police in cracking down on these dangerous bikes, but others feel that more needs to be done. The numbers speak for themselves, as 937 e-bikes were seized in the UK in the year leading up to August, which is a significant increase from the previous year's 511. This trend is alarming, especially since e-bike motors are legally required to cut out at 15.5mph. However, many of these bikes have been modified to go much faster.
What's even more concerning is that there is no legal distinction between electric motors and combustion engines. This means that if an e-bike can be operated without pedaling, it is essentially a moped or motorbike and should be registered, insured, and have a visible number plate. The rider should also have a valid license. These bikes are not allowed in cycle lanes and definitely not on sidewalks. So, the question is, why aren't the police taking more action against these regular and persistent law-breakers?
And let's not forget about the growing issue of electric scooters. George from London has had enough of these vehicles causing chaos on the streets. MetroTalk is urging readers to share their thoughts on this matter and others by texting VIEWS followed by their comment, name, and location to 65700. Alternatively, they can email their opinions to mail@ukThe Agency Helpline for Views, Rush-Hour Crush, and Good Deed Feed: 020 3615 0600. Providing a name and location with the comment increases the chances of being published. Full Terms and Conditions can be found on the Metro website, and readers can rest assured that the Independent Press Standards Organisation oversees the publication of all comments.
One reader, Pedro from Hammersmith, believes that e-bikes are a danger on the roads and should be registered or removed. He is not trying to take away the livelihood of delivery drivers, but he believes they should stick to using regular bicycles or switch to registered mopeds. Meanwhile, some readers are concerned about the declining number of pubs in England and Wales. Paul from Birmingham suggests that people should get off their sofas and support their local pub instead of spending their nights at home watching TV and scrolling through social media.
Another reader, Robert from London, is worried that the new "no-fault eviction" laws will only lead to worse behaviors from landlords. He reminds the government of the disastrous consequences of the 1965 Rent Act, which resulted in decent landlords leaving the market and a shortage of housing. This crisis led to the formation of charities like Shelter and Crisis, which are still active today. Robert believes that while there should be more protection for tenants, the government should carefully consider the potential outcomes of their decisions.
Deborah from London raises a valid point in the discussion about whether landlords should be required to evict antisocial tenants. While some may argue that this will protect the neighbors of these tenants, the reality is that it takes at least six months to process an eviction, and the changes being introduced will extend this period to 18 months. This poses a practical hurdle in the implementation of this policy. What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
