September 1st 2024.
Erik ten Hag faced criticism for his decision to substitute Alejandro Garnacho instead of Marcus Rashford during Manchester United's defeat to Liverpool on Sunday. Despite the backlash, the Dutchman stood by his choice and explained his reasoning. He also addressed the team's overall disappointing performance and defended his decision to substitute Casemiro at half-time.
The match against Liverpool was a difficult one for United, as they suffered a 3-0 loss at Old Trafford. Fans were particularly disappointed with the performances of Casemiro and Rashford, who both came under fire for their lackluster displays. While Casemiro was substituted at half-time, Rashford stayed on the pitch for the full 90 minutes despite failing to make an impact on the game.
In the second half, fans expressed their frustration when ten Hag chose to bring off Garnacho instead of Rashford as United desperately searched for a way back into the game. However, the manager defended his decision in a post-match interview, stating that both Garnacho and Joshua Zirkzee were not yet ready to play a full 90 minutes. He also mentioned that bringing on Amad Diallo, who deserved a chance to make an impact, was a strategic move.
Ten Hag also addressed the criticism surrounding Rashford's lack of shots on goal, stating that the Englishman had still provided valuable assists for Zirkzee. When questioned about his decision to substitute Casemiro at half-time, the manager remained confident in the player's abilities and assured that he will continue to improve and bounce back from this performance.
In the end, ten Hag emphasized his belief in the team's potential for growth and success, and praised Casemiro's character and experience. He acknowledged that the team had faced a tough loss, but remained optimistic for the future. As United fans anxiously await the team's next match, they can take comfort in knowing that the manager has a clear vision for the team's progress and will continue to make strategic decisions for their success.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
