November 2nd 2024.
There are a few different ways to approach understanding the political sway of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). One can take a broad view and examine the massive amounts of money that AIPAC spends on lobbying efforts. Alternatively, one can take a closer look at specific races where AIPAC has backed and financed victorious candidates.
But perhaps the most eye-opening perspective comes from progressive lawmakers who are concerned about facing similar consequences to those of Representative Jamaal Bowman. The New York Democrat was unseated in the Democratic primary after AIPAC's super PAC, United Democracy Project, poured millions of dollars into the race.
During an episode of The Intercept Briefing, Akela Lacy shares insights from her conversation with Representative Delia Ramirez, who revealed that she has spoken with multiple members of Congress who fear being "Jamaal-ed" by AIPAC. This phrase refers to the consequences faced by Bowman, who was seen as being at odds with AIPAC's agenda.
As Lacy explains in a discussion with Jessica Washington of The Intercept, these lawmakers not only worry about the repercussions of openly opposing Israel, but also about the potential consequences of staying silent on the matter. This fear highlights the level of influence that AIPAC holds over American elected officials.
To gain a deeper understanding of how AIPAC utilizes its influence to shape policies that benefit Israel, listen to the full conversation on The Intercept Briefing. It sheds light on the tactics and strategies used by AIPAC to sway American politics in favor of Israel.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
