.jpeg)
78 years have passed since independence. An overview of the governance over so many years..
The first curiosity that came to my mind was how to observe the period of governance. The reason for this is that for the executive to function properly, the maturity of the legislature is very important. Therefore, if the rulers are mature, the governance will be efficient. We have been taking those who have governed as examples since ancient times. For example, we have learned about many kings and ministers like Rama Rajya, Chanakya from history. Similarly, the governance of many leaders like Hitler, Mussolini, Karl Marx, John F. Kennedy comes before our eyes. Some of them are anti-people, while some have gone down in history as pro-people governments.
Here is an analysis of the governance of India. 78 years have passed since independence. We can observe the administration in three stages, how our expectations were, how it is, and how it can be during all these years of administration. The question of how it was arose here because we were under the rule of foreigners. You have explained what it is like later. It can be said that the British system of administration continues even today. The arrogance of the officials has continued like this. Senior officials use their subordinates for their own work, to put shoes on their feet, to put the chair in front of them when sitting and getting up. What is even sadder is that they wash their clothes with the clothes of their family members. The trend of having their subordinates do private work in the houses of officials is still prevalent.
I do not understand whether we have lost the right to question the efficiency of the executive or whether we have become tired of the common man's system and have accepted the system. In government departments, if you go inside the office and question them when there is no work being done, we are observing the processes of filing cases in court against the public under sections such as obstruction of work, threat of death, use of obscene language, etc., and in some cases, intimidating them by putting forward caste. Caste is not the only thing, and if the Sitaçi is an officer, they file a complaint saying that they tried to defame me.. It plays like a game of power.We are seeing that officials who should lead a simple life in the executive system are misusing government facilities and living a luxurious life. Everyone in government employment is sending their children to prestigious educational institutions, leaving the government bungalow and staying in luxurious bungalows. When they come on a tour on their government program, they take their family members on a tour. When they go, they used to stay in government guesthouses in the past. Later on, it was transferred to luxury hotels. Recently, it has reached resorts. There is a proverb in Kannada. ‘Yarappa’s money is everyone’s fair’. Because here all their expenses come from the government coffers. Otherwise, it would come from the pockets of local officials or employees. It is unfortunate that government systems, government vehicles, and junior government officials are being used for their family’s business.
Since there is a law on income limit in the executive system, we can see property purchases in benami names, black money, and having kgs of gold. Our misfortune is that they escape even from the law. In some cases, when the public brings problems with their properties to the attention of the authorities, the authorities themselves give compensation and transfer those properties in benami names. Earlier, the network that was only in big cities is now seen everywhere.
It is impossible to imagine what will happen. The situation has deteriorated so much. After independence, a democratic system was implemented in India. The governments elected by the people were gaining control over the administration. Thus, in order to gain control, the tendency to place officials who listen to their words in strategic places and exercise power grew. Both caste and money started working there. The tendency of changing officials whenever the governments change has been followed by all parties till today. This tendency seems to have hindered the ability of efficient officials to function independently. If this seems right from one perspective, it seems wrong from another perspective. If the legislature is right, the first is right. Because under a democratic system, it is good for the legislature to have administrative control. This ensures that work is done as per the instructions of the legislature. This ensures that the legislature has control over public service. Otherwise, if the officers do not have a service attitude, arrogance and corruption increase. This does more harm than good. In the same way, governments have devised strategies to curtail the power of many loyal officers who do not value the words, orders and recommendations of the elected government, the ministers of the departments concerned. For example, how can the Election Commission of India work? T.N. Seshan, who showed not only the people of the country but also the world how the authorities can use their powers, heated up the political parties. He heated up the political parties of the country only after assuming office. Until so many years, the Election Commission was allowed to appoint three members.
Note:This article is translated by xklsv.com, from shakthidaily.info; the Shakthi Daily is not liable for any errors in translation. If there are any errors in spellings, please mail [email protected]
