March 28th 2023.
(Image Source: https://metro.co.uk) An engineer has testified in court that Gwyneth Paltrow’s account of her 2016 ski slope incident is in line with the laws of physics.
Dr Irving Scher drew diagrams and presented an animation to the jury, refuting expert evidence previously heard in the courtroom and claiming the analysis had been miscalculated.
He said calculations by Dr Richard Boehne, which were heard last week, had been ‘thrown off’ by an incorrect velocity, suggesting that the plaintiff, Dr Terry Sanderson's, injuries would have been ‘much worse’ with the correct measurements.
‘Dr Boehne cannot say that Ms Paltrow’s version of events is impossible…,’ Dr Scher asserted. ‘It is the only version out of the two that matches with the laws of physics.’
The Iron Man actress is being sued for $300,000 by Sanderson, who alleged that she crashed into him on the slopes in Deer Valley Park, Utah, in 2016 – leaving him with broken ribs and permanent brain injury.
Paltrow has denied all claims and is countersuing the retired optometrist, 76, arguing that she was actually hit from behind and suffered minor injuries.
She took the stand on Friday and dismissed the notion that she was being ‘reckless’ on the slopes, telling the court: ‘I was not engaging in any risky behavior. I would not engage in risky behavior with or without my children being there.’
(Image Source: https://metro.co.uk) An engineer told the court today that Gwyneth Paltrow's version of events of her 2016 ski slope collision is consistent with the laws of physics.
Dr Irving Scher's diagrams and animation disproved the expert evidence previously heard in court, claiming that the analysis had been miscalculated.
He argued that calculations by Dr Richard Boehne, which were heard last week, had been ‘thrown off’ by an incorrect velocity, which would have resulted in Sanderson's injuries being ‘much worse’ with the correct measurements.
‘Dr Boehne cannot say that Ms Paltrow’s version of events is impossible…,’ Dr Scher said. ‘It is the only version out of the two that matches with the laws of physics.’
Paltrow is being sued for $300,000 by Sanderson, who asserted that she crashed into him on the slopes in Deer Valley Park, Utah, in 2016.
She has denied all claims and is countersuing the retired optometrist, 76, claiming that she was actually hit from behind and received minor injuries.
On Friday, Paltrow testified in court and denied being ‘reckless’ on the slopes, saying: ‘I was not engaging in any risky behavior. I would not engage in risky behavior with or without my children being there.’
(Image Source: https://metro.co.uk) An engineer has informed the court that Gwyneth Paltrow's description of the 2016 ski incident is in-line with the laws of physics
Biochemical engineer Dr Irving Scher presented diagrams and an animation to the jury at the Park City District Court today which disputed previously heard evidence that Paltrow was the one responsible for the collision.
He declared that calculations by Dr Richard Boehne, heard last week, had been ‘thrown off’ by an incorrect velocity, suggesting that Sanderson’s injuries would have been ‘much worse’ with the correct measurements.
‘Dr Boehne cannot say that Ms Paltrow’s version of events is impossible…,’ Dr Scher added. ‘It is the only version out of the two that matches with the laws of physics.’
Terry Sanderson is seeking $300,000 in damages, while the actress is counter-suing and asking for $1 in damages and her legal fees to be covered.
(Image Source: https://metro.co.uk) Earlier today, biochemical engineer Dr Irving Scher took the stand at the Park City District Court
The trial began last week in Utah, and Paltrow took the stand on Friday, denying any notion that she had been ‘reckless’ on the slopes.
‘I was not engaging in any risky behavior. I would not engage in risky behavior with or without my children being there,’ she told the court.
She went on to explain that she was confused and thought it might have been a ‘practical joke’ or something more ‘perverted’ when the incident occurred.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
