April 26th 2024.
The Delhi High Court has expressed its disappointment with the city government for not providing books to students in MCD schools. The court stated that the government's actions show that they prioritize their political interests over the well-being of the students and the nation.
The court's remarks came after the government's counsel mentioned that the matter required approval from Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who is currently in custody for a money laundering case related to the 2021 excise policy. The court pointed out that the government has been reminded several times to prioritize national interest, but this case highlights their wrongdoings.
The bench, consisting of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet P S Arora, reprimanded the government for placing their political interests before the students' education. They stated that the government's actions are unfortunate and wrong, and they would pass an order on this matter on Monday.
The court also pointed out that the government's lawyer seemed more interested in gaining power rather than addressing the issue at hand. They questioned the lawyer's intentions and stated that their pursuit of power is what's hindering them from taking action.
The bench further emphasized that leaders must always strive to include everyone and not indulge in one-upmanships. They also mentioned that the chief minister's personal choices should not affect the administration's functioning.
The government's lawyer assured the court that the issue of book supply would be resolved if the Municipal Corporation of Delhi commissioner makes a formal request for financial approvals, even without the standing committee's involvement.
The court noted that the government's lawyer was appearing on instructions from Urban Development Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj and warned that they would take strict action if the chief minister's custody is used as an excuse for inaction.
The court was hearing a PIL filed by NGO Social Jurist, represented by advocate Ashok Agarwal, highlighting the non-supply of educational material and other benefits to students in MCD schools. The MCD commissioner had earlier stated that the delay in distribution was due to the non-formation of a standing committee. The court had previously directed the government to delegate financial power to another appropriate authority in the absence of a standing committee.
However, during the hearing, the government's lawyer mentioned that the MCD commissioner could seek financial approvals even in such situations. The court was not convinced and questioned the government's ability to pass a resolution without delay.
The court also expressed their disappointment with the government for not providing basic facilities like desks and chairs to students. They questioned whether any of the corporators or the mayor would want their children to study in such conditions. The court concluded that the government does not seem to care about the common people's well-being and accused them of shedding crocodile tears.
In conclusion, the court reiterated that the government's actions are unacceptable, and they would take strict action if necessary. They also urged the government to prioritize the students' education and provide them with the necessary materials and facilities without any further delay.
[This article has been trending online recently and has been generated with AI. Your feed is customized.]
[Generative AI is experimental.]
